Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron – Rescue list


 * For more information about article rescue, please refer to ARS Tips to help rescue articles and ARS Rescue guide
 * For additional article improvement listings, check out this project's archives and listings at WikiProject Cleanup

This is a list and discussion of Wikipedia content for rescue consideration. When posting here, please be sure to:
 * First familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines for topic notability and identifying reliable sources, as well as the prohibition on inappropriate canvassing
 * Include a specific rationale why the article/content should be retained on Wikipedia, and any ideas to improve the content. Please ensure that your comment here is neutrally worded. (You can also !vote to delete an article at its deletion discussion because you think it is untenable in its present state, and still list it here in the hope that another editor will find a way to improve it and save it.)
 * You should disclose in a deletion discussion that a post has been made at the rescue list.
 * Sign posts with four tildes  ~ .
 * Place the  ~  template in Articles for deletion discussions, to notify editors about the listing here. The tag can be placed below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

The following templates can be used for articles listed here:
 * * - Adds source search options
 * * - Adds relevant links
 * * - Likewise but for page nominated twice
 * * - Likewise but for page nominated 3 times
 * * - Likewise but for page nominated N ≥ 4 times

ATTENTION! Go to https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/ to apply for access to multiple databases to search for sources to help save and improve articles.

 — Please post new entries at the top of the list — 

AREA (fashion label)
AREA (fashion label) has been nominated for deletion. The subject easily meets notability guidelines based on the current sourcing. Thriley (talk) 12:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 * if that's so, why does it need rescuing? 35.139.154.158 (talk) 17:41, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 * To find more sources and work on the article. Or to keep you from edit warring and deleting valid sourced content.   D r e a m Focus  16:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Instagram face
Instagram face has been nominated for deletion. Plenty of source material already. Any assistance with finding more would be appreciated. Thriley (talk) 18:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

List of Commodore 16 games
I need help finding sourcing. I found one physical museum that list 181 of them. Need help finding other physical museums that have physical copies of these video games in their collection. If you feel like clicking on an empty box in the reference column to add a reference to something from time to time, every little bit helps.  D r e a m Focus  07:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


 * If we cant find every single game, We might have to add a few to the infobox. The alternative is to delete them, as sadly we cant use another wikipedia page as a source. I will go and run some citation and bots on it to prevent the speedy deletion and/or deadlinksCooldudeseven7 (talk) 15:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Ignore all rules is a founding policy. The guidelines are just guidelines.  Follow policy.  Notability begins with: This page documents an English Wikipedia notability guideline. Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Exceptions links to the policy of ignore all rules, which says "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it."
 * There is no doubt that the games exist, you can find information about them, and pictures of them. So you don't need a reliable source telling you they exist.  Also if they have their own Wikipedia article, you can go there and find a reference if you want one.  I did that with dozens of them, then didn't see the point to keep bothering with it.  People can click the link and read about it.   D r e a m Focus  15:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Alex Lozupone
I hope this was the right place, I was looking through AFDs. Alex Lozupone was nominated and now I am overly confused at the discussion. I think from how I understand the policies it does pass as I discussed at the discussion but I need to step away, but I don’t want everyone else’s efforts to go away because I don’t understand policy. This musicians is not super notable but seems somehow to have some sources, maybe it is not enough, maybe there are some more. I created this article before knowing that he also does music. I don’t care to be involved in the harsh discussion anymore where people quickly vote without reading. Thank you. Maybe I am wrong, but the article was around a long time, and the user who nominated it and some other I created has stopped editing so it is confusing. ThreeBootsInABucket (talk)