Wikipedia:Article assessment/Extinct mammals/Australopithecus

Assessment of an article under the topic Extinct mammals.

Article: Australopithecus

Details of the assessment method can be found at the main page. Feel free to add comments when you assess an article, or use the talk page for discussion.

Review by Martin Walker

 * Coverage and factuality: 5
 * Rather narrow in scope, I'd like to see some more biology aspects that do not directly relate to evolution of homo sapiens. Needs refs.


 * Writing style: 6
 * A little dry, so hard to read in places (Note: I'm not familiar with the topic).


 * Structure: 6
 * I'd like to see more sections, but that may relate to the narrow scope (see above)


 * Aesthetics: 8
 * I liked the pictures a lot, and the two boxes are great.


 * Overall: 6

Martin Walker 22:43, 28 February 2006

Review by violet/riga

 * Coverage and factuality: 5
 * Looks at evolution, but has very few details about Australopithecus. Very poor referencing.


 * Writing style: 4
 * Does not grab attention and leaves the reader with confusion.


 * Structure: 4
 * Not a natural order; poorly structured; horribly short lead.


 * Aesthetics: 7
 * Two good images.


 * Overall: 5

The article is very hard to read and poor in quite a few areas. violet/riga (t) 20:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Review by [name]

 * Coverage and factuality:
 * Writing style:
 * Structure:
 * Aesthetics:
 * Overall: