Wikipedia:Article assessment/Hugo Award-winning works/A Canticle for Leibowitz

Assessment of an article under the topic Hugo Award-winning works.

Article: A Canticle for Leibowitz

Details of the assessment method can be found at the main page. Feel free to add comments when you assess an article, or use the talk page for discussion.

Review by Geo.plrd
Geo.plrd 23:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Coverage and factuality: 9
 * Writing style: 7
 * Structure: 7
 * Aesthetics: 8
 * Overall: 7 

Review by [User:JimDunning]
Parts of this article are well-written, but have few or no sources and appear to be original research (Literary significance). It is unorganized and the plot summary is far too detailed and long (per Project guidelines). Although some of the individual parts are good in themselves, overall the article requires a complete revamp.
 * Coverage and factuality: 5
 * Writing style: 6
 * Structure: 2
 * Aesthetics: 3
 * Overall: 3

Review by [User:]

 * Coverage and factuality:
 * Writing style:
 * Structure:
 * Aesthetics:
 * Overall: