Wikipedia:Article assessment/Hugo Award-winning works/Neuromancer

Assessment of an article under the topic Hugo Award-winning works.

Article: Neuromancer

Details of the assessment method can be found at the main page. Feel free to add comments when you assess an article, or use the talk page for discussion.

Review by [User:Gerry Ashton]
The article conveys the importance of this novel and is well structured. The synopsys seems overly long and overemphaisizes plot details as opposed to new concepts contained in the book. The article has a number of citations, but lacks in-line citations. There are four red links.
 * Coverage and factuality: 6
 * Writing style: 7
 * Structure: 8
 * Aesthetics: 7
 * Overall: 7

Review by [User:Viridtas]
The article has worsened since Gerry last assessed it. I've shortened the plot to meet Gerry's criticism, but concepts still need to be addressed in prose rather than list form. I'm in the process of adding more citations.
 * Coverage and factuality:6
 * Writing style:6
 * Structure:6
 * Aesthetics:6
 * Overall: 6