Wikipedia:Article assessment/Natural disasters/Nisqually earthquake

Assessment of an article under the topic Natural disasters.

Article: Nisqually earthquake

Details of the assessment method can be found at the main page. Feel free to add comments when you assess an article, or use the talk page for discussion.

Review by violet/riga (t)

 * Coverage and factuality: 3
 * The external link contains a wealth of information that shows how little this article covers; there are no references


 * Writing style: 8
 * Structure: N/A
 * The article is too short to rate the structure


 * Aesthetics: N/A
 * The article is too short to rate the aesthetics


 * Overall: 4

Little more than a stub. violet/riga (t) 21:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Review by MacGyverMagic

 * Coverage and factuality: 2
 * No inline citations, but all info is probably covered by external link. Just a few paragraphs. No doubt has major omissions. (Doesn't mention where the quake's name comes from).


 * Writing style: 3
 * Spelling and grammar are fine, but Seattle should've been mentioned sooner. Doesn't explain the word subduction. Barely keeps interest.


 * Structure: 1
 * No lead, images, templates or tables. Gets 1 point for being linked to.


 * Aesthetics: 1
 * Is essentially a stub and looks the part.


 * Overall: 2
 * Needs massive expansion. - Mgm|(talk) 21:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Review by [name]

 * Coverage and factuality:
 * Writing style:
 * Structure:
 * Aesthetics:
 * Overall: