Wikipedia:Article improvement drive/Removed/27 February 2005

Antigua and Barbuda*

 * Reason: Could be longer. Needs a map.


 * Support
 * 1) Maurreen 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Dmcdevit 18:21, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Tuf-Kat 03:18, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) kaal 06:02, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Darwinek 19:32, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Has a CIA map and a map of the administrative divisions. What specific map did you have in mind? --Golbez 21:07, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * The map does not show for me, but the box does. Maurreen 01:46, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Criticisms of War on Terrorism*

 * Reason: Writing needs work. It's not cohesive and there are grammar problems. Attribution is also weak. On the other hand, this could become contentious.


 * Support
 * 1) Maurreen 06:29, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Litefantastic 17:48, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) 119 19:28, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Darwinek 19:30, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) GuloGuloGulo 01:44, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Totally agree. Important but volitile subject; heavily POV just now. -Litefantastic 17:48, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Culture*

 * Reason: The article is now fairly deep but narrow.


 * Support
 * 1) Maurreen 05:58, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Tuf-Kat 17:47, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)


 * Comments

Graphic design*

 * Reason: Mostly about the history, little on the principles and practices.


 * Support
 * 1) Maurreen 05:58, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Comments

Poetry*

 * Reason: Saw this on the featured article removal candidates. It's a holdover from the less stringent FA rules, I'd guess. It definitely needs work -- that list is ugly, it's nowhere near comprehensive and there's a single reference! --Dmcdevit 07:35, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Support
 * 1) Dmcdevit 07:35, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Maurreen 08:20, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Tuf-Kat 01:29, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Felix Wan 22:55, 2005 Feb 26 (UTC)


 * Comments

Pope John Paul I*
I tried to get this passed to FA, but couldn't. Too heavily biased and very rumor-ridden, it needs help.
 * Reason:
 * Support
 * 1) Litefantastic 17:46, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) 119 08:21, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Maurreen 04:22, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Not that far away from FA, methinks. It needs POV patching and maybe some reasearch, but the framework is there. -Litefantastic 17:46, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Voyager 1*

 * Reason: Both the voyager missions did a lot of science and very little is covered in the article.
 * Support
 * 1) kaal 06:11, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) 119 08:21, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * cannot nominate for the COTW as not stub, but still very brief.

Voyager 2*

 * Reason: Both the voyager missions did a lot of science and very little is covered in the article.
 * Support
 * 1) kaal 06:11, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) 119 08:21, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * cannot nominate for the COTW as not stub, but still very brief.

Non-Aligned Movement*

 * Reason: Extensively linked-to article which is currently very far from comprehensive and lacks references.


 * Support
 * 1) 119 08:33, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Maurreen 04:22, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comments

Duck and Cover (film)*

 * Reason: The cold war paranoia film!


 * Support
 * 1) Litefantastic 00:17, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Circeus 00:57, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) 119 05:00, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I tried to get this passed to FA twice, and was shut down both times. When I discovered the COTW, I posted it there, but had to remove it when they told me things had to be stubs. Perhaps it will do better here. -Litefantastic 00:17, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)