Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2008-03-27

Arpeika
Arpeika to Ar-pi-uck-i (Sam Jones)


 * Comment. Arpeika is a commonly used alternative to Ar-pi-uck-i (Sam Jones). 71.184.55.42 (talk) 00:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Declined. This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see tips on how to better format your article. Torchwood Who? (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * style="text-align:center;" | This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. 
 * }
 * }

Gamecube New Years
-->===Who discovered this Holiday?===

-->Discovered by: Bobby K. of Clifton, NJ

-->===How was this Holiday discovered?===

-->It was discovered at my Grandma's House back in 2006. Me and one of my friends were messing around with the internal clock. We set it for "December 31, 2099 at 23 Hours 59 mins. and 45 secs. We counted down until it reached the New Year. We wanted to see what would happen, because we thought it would go back to 2000. We thought that because the clock wouldn't go to 2100. To are amazement it went to 2100. If you try this I would reccomend you never touch the internal clock ever again in your entire life, because it will change back to 2000.

-->===Do I have no life whatsoever?===

-->No, I actually have a great life.

-->===What do you do on this holiday?===

-->You see your friends, play video games, party, watch the countdown of the gamecube internal clock, "act" like you've been drinking all night, all though you have been drinking Sprite all night.

-->===Why would you celebrate this holiday?===

-->Because it is better than most holidays. Examples-(Groundhog Day, Lief Erikson Day, George Bush's Inaugaration Day).

-->===When to celebrate and when was it discovered?===

-->May 21 (every year)and May 21, 06

-->===What is the point of all this?===

-->To make this holiday extremely famous.

-->===Any other holidays?===

-->Yes

X-BOX 360 Christmas-? April 14-April 13 to April 15 (A.K.A.-My Birthday) Do Nothing Day-?-(many dates) Do Something Day-?-(many dates, and always is day after "Do-Nothing Day")

Sorry,everyone reading this,if this page looks odd, because I almost never type on the computer.

As for the other Holidays mentioned above, I will edit them in when I have some free time.

Also if anyone wants to edit something on this page feel free just don't screw it up.

Finally I end off with, If you have questions, want to tell me something about this page go ahead, just don't hate on me and shit like that.

Sources-1-Personal Knowledge 2-Wikipedia-Holidays 3-Friends 4-Parents 5-Teachers Of Clifton High School 6-2 forums on internet (cannot remember websites currently)

Declined. This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject. See the speedy deletion criteria (A7) and/or guidelines on notability. Please provide more information on why the subject is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --EoL talk 01:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * style="text-align:center;" | This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. 
 * }
 * }

Tulsa Beacon
The Tulsa Beacon is a weekly newspaper in Tulsa, Oklahoma. It was founded by Charles and Susan Biggs under the corporate name Biggs Communications, Inc. The first paper was published in April, 2001. The Tulsa Beacon features news from Tulsa and the surrounding area. It includes local columnists, a recipe page, church news, columns by Dr. Billy Graham and Dr. James Dobson, local editorials and letters to the editor, syndicated columnists (Robert Novak, David Limbaugh, Mona Charen and Walter Williams), local sports, television listings, movie reviews, classified ads and legal notices. The Tulsa Beacon is a legal newspaper and a member of the Oklahoma Press Association. The Tulsa Beacon has a conservative editorial policy with a evangelical Christian influence. The Tulsa Beacon is "Tulsa's Family Newspaper."

Dan Biton
Copyright material has been removed

Little Prince (chief)
Little Prince or Tustenuggee (d. 1832) was an 18th century chieftain and longtime representative of the lower Creeks from the 1780s until his death in 1832. During the early 1800s, he and Big Warrior shared the leadership of the Creek National Council.

Biography
Little Prince is first recorded in 1780 living as a chieftain at Broken Arrow. During the summer, he joined British Indian Agent John Tate who led a combined force of Upper and Lower Creeks to support Colonel Thomas Brown at Augusta, Georgia who was at the time defending the city against American forces.

After Tate died en route to the city, most of the Upper Creek with the exception of Tukabatchee chieftain Efa Tustenuggee returned to their villages while Little Prince and his 250 warriors continued on to Augusta. Arriving in time to take part in the Battle of Augusta, Little Prince led an attack to break the siege by Colonel Elijah Clarke suffering 70 casualties as a result.

Following the American retreat, a number of American prisoners were handed over to the Creek and tortured before their execution most notably the garrison commanding officers Brown and Grierson. How much control Little Prince had over his warriors at this point is disputed among historians however his ally Efa Tustenuggee was said by General Thomas S. Woodward to be "the most hostile and bitter enemy the white people ever had".

He was a later signatory of the Treaty of Colerain in 1796, thereafter a supporter of peaceful relations with the United States government, although he would take part in the Creek War in 1813. He and seven other chieftains were involved in the execution of Little Warrior during the spring of 1813, however he would retain his position of the lower Creek until his death in 1832.

Arpeika (resubmission)
Arpeika to Ar-pi-uck-i (Sam Jones)


 * Comment. This request for a redirect was declined earlier tonight, however I fail to understand the reasoning. This is a submission for a redirect, not a new article. Arpeika is the non-phonetic spelling of Ar-pi-uck-i (Sam Jones), the name being in common usage as well as on a number of pages on Wikipedia. 71.184.55.42 (talk) 00:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Article created. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! Torchwood Who? (talk) 05:32, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * style="text-align:center;" | This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. 
 * }
 * }

EtaStar
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;" ! style="background-color:#ffcece" | This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it. ''This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.'' If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" |
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" |

Our Vision is

We strive to be the most preferred property developer by building better living environments and exceeding customer expectations.

webgui
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;" ! style="background-color:#A0FFA0" | This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it. ''This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.''
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" |
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" |


 * 1) REDIRECT WebGUI

Bicycle Cards

 * 1) REDIRECT Bicycle Playing Cards

Manchester Wheel
Redirect to Yorkshire Wheel

Street v. New York
In Street v. New York, 394 U.S. 576 (1969), the United States Supreme Court held, by a vote of 5 to 4, that a New York state law making it a crime "publicly [to] mutilate, deface, defile, or defy, trample upon, or cast contempt upon either by words or act [any flag of the United States]" was, in part, unconstitutional because it prohibited speech against the flag.

The Court left for a later day the question of whether it is constitutional or unconstitutional to prohibit, without reference to the utterance of words, the burning of the flag.

background
The Constitution provides that all Americans have the right to free speech; specifically, the First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." This prohibition has been interpreted by the courts as applying to the entire Federal government, but is not unlimited. . The First Amendment protection of free speech is made binding on the state governments by way of the Fourteenth Amendment, which states that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

facts and procedural history
After hearing a news report of the murder of James Meredith, the defendant, Sidney Street, took a 48-star U.S. flag and burned it. Upon being questioned by police, he said, "Yes; that is my flag; I burned it. If they let that happen to Meredith, we don't need an American flag."

He was arrested, and a document was prepared that charged him with

"the crime of Malicious Mischief in that [he] did willfully and unlawfully defile, cast contempt upon and burn an American Flag, in violation of 1425-16-D of the Penal Law, under the following circumstances: . . . [he] did willfully and unlawfully set fire to an American Flag and shout, 'If they did that to Meredith, We don't need an American Flag.'"Id.

A bench trial was held, he was convicted, and his conviction was upheld on appeal both by the intermediate appellate court and by the New York Court of Appeals. The United States Supreme Court considered the following questions:


 * were the state courts given the opportunity to decide "the constitutionality of the 'words' part of the statute"? The Supreme Court will not consider the question of whether a state statute is unconstitutional unless the question is first raised in state court.
 * Given that the defendant also flag-burning, did the defendant's words independently contribute to his conviction?
 * Is the prohibition on uttering words in contempt of the Flag actually unconstitutional?
 * If this prohibition is actually unconstitutional, would that require reversal of the defendant's conviction?

The decision of the Court
Before reaching the constitutional questions, the Supreme Court first considered whether it had jurisdiction or not. According to precedent, when hearing an appeal on certiorari from the highest court of a state, the United States Supreme Court will only pass judgment on the constitutionality of a state law if the question was first raised in state court. Relying on New York ex rel. Bryant v. Zimmerman, 278 U.S. 63, 67 (1928), cf. People v. McLucas, 15 N.Y.2d 167, 172, 204 N.E.2d 846, 848 (1965), the Supreme Court held that it did in fact have jurisdiction.

The majority opinion of the Court considered that the State both mentioned the defendant's utterance, "If they did that to Meredith, We don't need an American Flag," in the charging document, and elicited testimony regarding this utterance at trial. Furthermore, "[t]he State never announced that it was relying exclusively upon the burning." For these reasons, Justice Harlan, writing for the majority, determined that it was not possible "to eliminate the possibility either that appellant's words were the sole basis of his conviction or that appellant was convicted for both his words and his deed."

To determine whether the prohibition of "words" in contempt of the American flag was constitutional or not, the majority examined four legitimate public interests that putatively were protected by the law being challenged: The Court found that all four of these interests, considered together, are not sufficient to justify any law prohibiting the utterance of "words" against the U.S. flag.
 * 1) an interest in deterring appellant from vocally inciting others to commit unlawful acts;
 * 2) an interest in preventing appellant from uttering words so inflammatory that they would provoke others to retaliate physically against him, thereby causing a breach of the peace;
 * 3) an interest in protecting the sensibilities of passers-by who might be shocked by appellant's words about the American flag, and
 * 4) an interest in assuring that appellant, regardless of the impact of his words upon others, showed proper respect for our national emblem.

Finally, Quoting Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. at 367-368, the Court held that "The verdict against the appellant was a general one. It did not specify the ground upon which it rested. . . . [I]t is impossible to say under which clause of the statute the conviction was obtained. If any one of these clauses . . . was invalid, it cannot [p586] be determined upon this record that the appellant was not convicted under that clause. . . . It follows that . . . the conviction cannot be upheld." That is, when a defendant is convicted of violating a law only part of which is unconstitutional, and the trial record does not sufficiently demonstrate that he was convicted solely of violating that part of the law that is constitutional, then the Court will reverse the conviction. Thus, the case was remanded to the state courts of New York for further proceedings.

Chief Justice Earl Warren's dissent
Chief Justice Earl Warren (widely regarded as one of the most liberal chief justices ever to serve on the United States Supreme Court) strongly criticized the majority's narrow reliance on the question of whether a prohibition on "words" uttered against the flag is constitutional or not. In deciding the case on such a narrow ground, the majority "declined to meet and resolve the basic question presented in the case." . This is not to say that he dissents from "the general rule that this Court should not treat broad constitutional questions when narrow ones will suffice to dispose of the litigation," but rather, neither the prosecution nor the defense based their arguments on the question of whether it is constitutional or unconstitutional to prohibit the utterance of "words" against the flag. Instead, both sides argued vigorously regarding the Constitution allows states to prohibit the burning of the flag. Furthermore, Chief Justice Warren's reading of the trial transcript was that the burning was the central issue of the case, the defense theory of the case being that the defendant "burned the flag in a dignified manner," (emphasis added); thus, in his opinion, the narrow focus on the "words" uttered by the defendant and prohibited by the state law was simply not in accord with the facts of the case. However, Warren was of the opinion that laws against flag-burning are constitutional, and that therefore the defendant's conviction should have been affirmed.

Justice Hugo Black's dissent
Justice Black, in a brief but vigorous dissent, wrote that "I agree with the excellent opinion written by Chief Judge Fuld for a unanimous Court of Appeals, upholding the New York statute which this Court now holds unconstitutional as applied." . The New York law prohibited the burning of the U.S. flag, and the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant burned the U.S. flag, and the utterances of the defendant were, in Black's view, irrelevant.

If the New York law in fact prohibited "words" against the flag, Black wrote, the law would unquestionably be unconstitutional – so blatantly unconstitutional, in fact, that there would be no need for the Court to balance any purported legitimate state interests against the defendant's freedom of speech. . However, because Justice Black was satisfied that the defendant was convicted solely of burning the flag, and because burning the flag is "an integral part of conduct in violation of a valid criminal statute," he would affirm the defendant's conviction.

Justice Byron White's dissent
Justice White strongly chastised the court for failing to reach the core question of whether a state may prohibit the burning of the flag: "he Court has spun an intricate, technical web but I fear it has ensnared itself in its own remorseless logic and arrived at a result having no support in the facts of the case or the governing law." In his dissent, he says that "is a distortion of the record" for the majority of the Court to have relied on the defendant's putative conviction for uttering words against the flag, as if "the trial court convicted him for speech alone, and acquitted him of flag burning." He then cites a string of decisions in support of the proposition that if a defendant is convicted of one crime as a result of his commission of two putatively illegal acts (burning the flag and speaking against the flag), and the conviction was invalid as to one act (speaking against the flag), this does not invalidate the conviction of the other act (burning the flag), and suggests that even if the conviction be reversed it should be remanded for resentencing only.

However, Judge White did not go so far as to say that flag-burning is not constitutionally protected; rather, he wrote that "without the benefit of the majority's thinking if it were to find flag burning protected by the First Amendment, I would sustain such a conviction."

Justice Abe Fortas' dissent
Justice Fortas agreed with Chief Justice Warren's dissent, but added a brief additional explanation of why he thought that it would be constitutional to ban flag-burning. First, he argued, if the flag were nothing more than an ordinary item of property, the state could prohibit its burning merely as an exercise of its authority to protect the public safety. The flag's status as a special emblem of nationality, however, entitle it to additional protections, some of which have been upheld by the Court in the past. . In summary,   "Protest does not exonerate lawlessness"; thus, the state can prohibit the burning of any item in public, and the nature of the flag entitles it to more protection under the law, rather than less. .

Further developments
The Street court did not consider whether a prohibition on burning the flag, without also prohibiting words against the flag, would be constitutional or unconstitutional. This question would remain open until 1989, when in Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, the Court invalidated a flag-burning statute.

this kid
this kid partitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningpartitioningvv

Declined. Your article appears to be a joke. Wikipedia only contains factual entries, so your comedic efforts cannot be rewarded here. Yngvarr (c) 09:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * style="text-align:center;" | This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. 
 * }
 * }

James Grant (publisher)
James Grant is the publisher of Grant's Interest Rate Observer and a columnist for Forbes magazine. He has written four books on finance and history.

Maria Velcheva
I have found a comment on http://chesslodge.blogspot.com/2007/09/beauty-chess.html that Maria Velcheva (famous chess player) is cute. I agree. 

Murilo Endres
Murilo Endres (known simply as Murilo; born May 3 1981) is a Brazilian volleyball player.

With Brazil national team he won two World Leagues (2006,2007), one World Cup (2007) and one World Championships.

He currently plays as wing-spiker for Cimone Modena, Italy. He is the younger brother of Gustavo Endres also plays in Italian Serie A.



Category:1981 births Category:Living people Category:Brazilian volleyball players

BAZEOS TOWER
Copyright material has been removed

Larry Caton
Larry Caton was on the 1972 United States Olympic Handball team. He is my father and I am very proud of him. The team may not have benn amazing, but they still made it to the Olympics and that is saying a lot. My brother has won a State Championship in swimming. He along with three other men, took the gold at the Florida State Swim Meet. The four of them won the 200 yard Medely Relay. My brother was the first in the water with a time of 25.53 in the 50 yard backstroke to start the relay off.

Comedy-horror
List of comedy horror films

Edmond Butler
Edmund or Edmond Butler (March 19 or September 19, 1827-August 21, 1895) was a US Army officer who served with the Union Army during the American Civil War and later became a prominent Indian fighter in the Northern Plains, Rocky Mountains and southwest United States in the post-Civil War era. In 1877, he was awarded the Indian Wars Congressional Medal of Honor for gallantry against the Sioux and Cheyenne at Battle of Wolf Mountain.

Biography
Edmond Bulter was born in Ireland and immigrated to the United States as a young man. Shortly after arriving in Brooklyn, New York, he enlisted in the US Army and commissioned as a second lieutenant in the 5th U.S. Infantry in October 1861. He was also assigned to special duty with the inspector of volunteer units in Kansas and Missouri.

In 1862, he was sent to the New Mexico Territory and later assisted in the reconstruction of Fort Bliss after its recapture by the Union. He was eventually reassigned to Fort Wingate, New Mexico and, in 1865, commanded an expedition against the Navajos living in Canyon de Chelly. Intercepting a Navajo raiding party under Manuelito Grande, he recovered a number of sheep and other livestock taken from the neighboring Apache. After a period of 22-days, in which he had covered 720 miles, 31 Navajos were killed while another 27 were captured. He was also involved in the relocation of 3,000 Navajo to the Fort Sumner Reservation on the Pecos River.

Transferred to Kansas in 1866, he spent two years there before being assigned to the Beecher Island-site in December 1868 to bring in the bodies of the soldiers killed during the Battle of Beecher Island. Despite a large Sioux presence in the area, Butler successfully removed the bodies from the site despite being "under the fire of the main body of Sioux". However, he was unable to find the remains of Lieutenant Fredrick H. Beecher and Acting Surgeon J.H. Mooer suggesting their bodies had been removed by the Sioux "probably in revenge for rifling Sioux graves on the Republican (earlier by camp followers)".

During 1869, while assigned to guard the Fort Wallace-Denver stage route, Bulter volunteered to join an expedition under Lieutenant Colonel Charles R. Woods against the Pawnees.

Returning to Kansas in October 1871, he was assigned to operations to control "organized land-leaguers" in the southeast. Three years later, he served with Lieutenant General Nelson A. Miles during the Red River Campaign and in the Black Hills War in which he led six companies in pursuit of Sitting Bull. Although Sitting Bull and Gall escaped to Canada, he was involved in the capture of eight other Sioux chieftains and around 700 lodges.

On January 8, 1877, Bulter took part in the engagement against the Lakota Sioux and Northern Cheyenne at Wolf Mountain. In command of Company C, he was commanded for his actions during the battle for "conspicious gallantry in leading his command against greatly superior numbers of hostile Indians, strongly entrenched" and recieving a berevet of major and officially awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor.

Later that year, he escorted Chief Joseph and other Nez Perce to Fort Buford between October-November 1877. During the early 1880s, he was stationed at Fort Snelling, Minnesota, Fort Keogh, Montana and guarded construction parties of the Northern Pacific Railroad. He also held numerous staff positions and eventually awarded the rank of lieutenant colonel shortly before his retirement on March 9, 1891. He died in Trouville, France three years later and, his body being returned to the United States, later buried in Holy Sepulchre Cemetery in Omaha, Nebraska.

Wikipedia:assess

 * 1) REDIRECT Template:Grading scheme

COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE ,KOLHAPUR
'''this college was made in 1960. '''It was under the Sivaji university then Now this is under the M.P.K.V, Rahuri which is a prominant university of the india. It has got 60 crore rupees ,this yr from govt. for it's assistance.

Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Steve Crossin (talk to me) 20:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * style="text-align:center;" | This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. 
 * }
 * }

Madtsoia
Madtsoia is an extinct genus of Madtsoiidae.

The Polar Bear King (1991)
Copyright material removed

Witwatia
Witwatia schlosseri is an extinct genus of giant bat that lived in Egypt during the Eocene.

Video Game Vehicle
A Video Game Vehicle (VGV) is a portable vehicle which consists of a variety of video games and devices that can be used at anyone's convenience for a specific set of time. The first portable arcade games were created in the 1950s by William A. Higinbotham. Since then, many more games have been created and the VGV is the "latest" way of playing for some people. The VGV is also known as The Game Coach to many people. It was created in 2006 by Steve Marcy. Its creation has led to many people enjoying the fun of a video games since some families can't afford their own gaming system. Its main purpose is to provide a place for families and friends to come together and enjoy one of the world's many creations. Video games are meant to be played by a large group of people, the VGV allows that by providing more than one game console in the same place. The VGV can be used for any type of occasion - birthdays, parties, barbecues, etc. - with no negative outcome.

Silver-Fork Deformity
A deformity seen in Colles' fracture in which the wrist or forearm has a curve like that of the back of a fork

Steuben Field
The Hamilton College football team plays on Steuben Field constructed in 1897, one of the top ten oldest collegiate football fields in the United States. The field is named for Baron von Steuben who laid the cornerstone of the school acting as Alexander Hamilton's surrogate. Upon graduating, all Hamilton seniors receive a cane as a gift from the college. The cane's design features a tricorn hat at the top of the cane to honor von Steuben.

It's Only Me
It's Only Me is the offical debut album by Sara Paxton. This is Paxton's second album to be recorded but first to be released. Paxton began work on this album after she decieded that her intended debut album wasn't what she wanted. She began writing songs early 2007 and recording late 2007. The will contain pop/rock and R&B music. A few songs on the album will be re-recorded versions of songs that were intended to be on her last effort.

Possible Songs

 * Hidden
 * Impossible
 * Missing You Everyday
 * Sunday Blues
 * Unneeded
 * Wish You Were Here
 * Let This Go
 * Because I Hate You (Oringinally from first effort)
 * Hollywood Dreams
 * Love Story
 * I Won't Forget You
 * Girl A On Mission (Originally from first effort)
 * Til' The End

Ctenosauriscus
Ctenosauriscus koeneni is an extinct genus of sail-backed archosaur from the Triassic.