Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Camelot Lost"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Boldly changed to redirect to correct title. I'll drop a note at the other AfD discussion asking the closing admin to take a gander here for more arguments. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:32, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

&quot;Camelot Lost&quot;

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable book; satisfies none of the criteria of WP:NB Smeazel (talk) 08:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Self published (PublishAmerica is a print on demand publisher), no indication of any notability. Fram (talk) 10:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article asserts no notability and fails WP:BOOKS and WP:RS. --  JediLofty UserTalk 12:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: A non-notable self-published book. Schuym1 (talk) 17:01, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet WP:BOOK criteria.-- S R X  23:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Less than 20 ghits, it does not appear this book has received substantial coverage from reliable sources. Fails WP:BK. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 01:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Since listing this page, I noticed there was also a near-identical page at Camelot Lost (without the quotation marks). Had I noticed that page at the time I listed this one, I would have listed both pages together; as it is, I made a separate AfD listing for the other page.  (If a more experienced editor knows of a good way to combine the two listings, you're certainly welcome to do so.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.133.246.81 (talk) 07:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Whoops, that was me, of course; didn't realize I wasn't signed in. Sorry. --Smeazel (talk) 17:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as self-published and a violation of WP:BOOK. Erik the Red  2 ( AVE · CAESAR ) 18:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-published books are seldom notable, and there's no idication this one is. Article appears to exist solely to advertise the book.  Also, considering the duplicate article, Salt. Edward321 (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.