Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Crick" vs "Creek"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 06:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

"Crick" vs "Creek"

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article should be deleted as it fails WP:NOTDICT as it is just the origin of creek (something that should be in a dictionary). -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions) 01:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a crickin' dictionary. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The article doesn't even say who pronounces it "crick" -- if the urban/rural split is a US-thing then it could be redirected to somewhere within North American English regional phonology perhaps. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrStrauss (talk • contribs) 10:34, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 17:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.