Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"El Cashico"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

"El Cashico"

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable neologism. Search found several sources using the term (incl. some RS ones like BBC, Telegraph, etc.), but WP:NEO requires sources to actually discuss it, not just use it, for notability to be established. Of those, I found none. (Also, the article mentions two competing terms, 'El Cashico' and 'Oil Classico', suggesting the neologism isn't very well established yet.) Hence fails WP:GNG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - unclear if this article is meant to actually be about the rivalry between the two clubs or simply the use of this term to describe it, but either way it's not notable. There's no real rivalry between the two clubs and no evidence that this term has caught on as a way to describe it -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * if you read the whole thing, it is noted that it isn’t necessarily a proper rivalry, but is used in the media to describe it -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 12:23, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 11:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper 18:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper 18:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment There is a degree of some notability on the subject, to say no evidence of notability is a stupid delete argument, when there are clearly sources stating otherwise. There isn't much to the article really. But I really don't see enough depth to this, nor do I see a location for a redirect so I do lean towards delete. Govvy (talk) 06:55, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - if by any chance the article gets kept, it should be moved to a title without quote marks -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:18, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - some coverage and I can understand the reason why this match is perhaps slightly special but I'm not seeing enough to pass WP:GNG currently. No prejudice against recreation if this does become a more established rivalry in the future. At best we're a bit WP:TOOSOON here. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator Aloolkaparatha (talk) 09:37, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. KingSkyLord (talk &#124; contribs)
 * Delete Not Notable. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 09:47, 25 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.