Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Her Voice Is Beyond Her Years"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Mew discography.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 02:36, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

"Her Voice Is Beyond Her Years"

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Is every single by this artist really notable? A couple links in the template which includes them all pointed (accidentally) at completely unrelated things, such as Mica, too. Anyway, the criteria for notability here is at WP:NSONG. These articles are really little more than lists of release data, with the odd description. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 06:23, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge all to a Mew discography. Several of these were chart hits, so they are notable, but with this amount of information the individual articles would be better merged into a single article and trimmed a little.--Michig (talk) 07:04, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Also linked by the template via a redirect was Kong Kristian stod ved højen mast, the Danish royal anthem :-) Nyttend (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Question Some of these articles have rather more information than just release data; see Apocalypso and 156 for (unsourced) examples. If merging is an appropriate solution for the just-release-data articles, is it really appropriate for ones such as these two?  Nyttend (talk) 15:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If the additional info can be sourced then separate articles should be fine. For those with just tracklisting and release dates, probably better to merge.--Michig (talk) 16:18, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment. See also Her Voice Is Beyond Her Years. I've removed the PROD from this. It should be included in this discussion.--Michig (talk) 07:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Question - of the two identical articles Her Voice Is Beyond Her Years and "Her Voice Is Beyond Her Years", shouldn't one of them be speedy deleted immediately as a duplicate, while the survivor remains part of this discussion? -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 15:17, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, the duplicate with the quote marks in the title should go. Since it's the one chosen to head the whole discussion, though, I would suggest waiting until the discussion ends in case anyone thinks the article under discussion has been speedied and the discussion is therefore moot. Unless someone can suggest a better approach.--Michig (talk) 15:25, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There could be a bunch of crazy moving and renaming of one or both articles now. But to avoid even more confusion, it can probably wait until after this AfD debate concludes, as long as someone remembers to follow up. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 15:29, 25 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep All these songs have charted in Denmark and many have charted in the top 40 in the UK. They are, like hundreds of thousands of Wiki articles, stubs at the minute but that doesn't mean they can't, or won't be expanded. I will look for sources but I'm very busy with other things at the minute. Cavie78 (talk) 00:36, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge - to a new Mew discography as suggested by Michig. If you look at the band page now, there is already a fairly well-developed discography section. The band is eligible for a full discography article. (See WP:DISCOGRAPHY.) That would be a good place to keep the information on the individual single releases that is already in the articles under discussion here. That would keep everything well-organized, and while some of the songs under discussion are notable because they charted, I don't believe that they have all reached that point. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 15:26, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.