Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"In My Nature"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nuttin' Nyce. czar 22:00, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

"In My Nature"

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unreferenced "article" (actually just an infobox and a "chart performance" table, with no actual text attached) about a song. As always, songs do not get an automatic presumption of notability per WP:NSONGS just because they exist -- and while the chart performance table claims that the song peaked #83 in Billboard, that is not high enough a chart position to earn it a freebie in the absence of any reliable source coverage (or, again, any actual content) about the song. Bearcat (talk) 18:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Move to In My Nature and redirect to Nuttin' Nyce. If all there is for this is the chart position, it's listed and sourced there. A stand-alone article is unnecessary. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 00:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Nuttin' Nyce. --Lockley (talk) 05:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:19, 23 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Nuttin' Nyce. per the above 2 comments. d.g. L3X1  (distænt write)   )evidence(  16:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.