Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Intelligent, but lazy"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

"Intelligent, but lazy"
Dicdef - Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but Wiktionary is. Werdna648T/C\@ 10:52, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:27, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and do not move to Wiktionary'. This article uses a circular definition.--Mareino 15:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the argument for circularity. This could possibly survive on something akin to urbandictionary.com but the definition would have to be rewritten to remove the circular thought. -- (aeropagitica)  17:17, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It isn't suitable for Wiktionary, not only because of the circularity but also because it isn't a single word or a common phrase. It's pretty self-explanatory as well. Dan 18:20, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as dicdef and in any case so effing obvious that nobody could conceivably need to look it up. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] AfD? 22:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as crap -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:48, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-05 04:53Z 
 * Delete. Incognito 06:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a slang guide--Bill 22:15, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary according to official policy.  - MB (Talk)  11:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Phrase is self explanitory. (Boorishbehaviour 16:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.