Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Maurizio Bragagni"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

"Maurizio Bragagni"

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear to pass WP:GNG, many sources available are not significant coverage, only thing I could find is this which is not much, and highly dubious as to whether that site passes WP:RS Garnarblarnar (talk) 23:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Neutral comment The quote marks indicate an evasion of some kind...and indeed, Articles for deletion/Maurizio Bragagni exists. Outside the new information about the San Marino honorary consolation, it seems likely this is a copy of that, though an admin would have to compare to confirm.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:46, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: The versions are not similar, specifically there are many new claims to notability from after 2017. Three knighthoods. Geschichte (talk) 10:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you...that does make it easier for me.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Likely disclosed paid editing. Has COI issues and was previously deleted. Being an honorary consul is an accolade that can bought by wealthy businessmen, but it does not make them more notable. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 10:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems more like a WP:RESUME than an article, talking about all the titles the subject has katamari'ed onto it than what they did to deserve all those titles, and the mention of their job is sourced to PR about merely being at COP26; definite COI issues.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article reads more like a WP:RESUME than an article in an encyclopaedia. The subject appears to be an accomplished person, but not notable enough for their own Wikipedia article and so this should be deleted. Such-change47 (talk) 12:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG does not have encyclopedic knowledge Juggyevil (talk) 17:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete not even remotely close to being notable. Being a regular consul is almost never grounds for notability, even if you are a consul general for a major country in one of their major export markets, even being ambassador is not a default grounds for notability. Honorary consuls are basically non-notable for that period, although some are notable for other things. Nothing about this article suggests Bragagni is such a case.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable. Will not pass WP:GNG. VincentGod11 (talk) 14:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.