Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"NBA Coach of the Year Curse"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

"NBA Coach of the Year Curse"

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not a notable topic. (The title is wrong anyway, including quotes on both sides.) &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 12:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:HOAX. Tarheel95 (talk) 12:51, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought about "hoax" but you will actually get some google results for this term. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 12:53, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Were any of these results reliable? Tarheel95 (talk) 16:22, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete A remarkably uninformative article. The nominator is to be praised for waiting to see if there was any sign of an intent to do more, rather than tagging it immediately, but after a few hours, it's clear that "that's all she wrote".  Mandsford 15:33, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The title is wrong due to the quotation marks, and the article has hardly any content and no sources. If editors believe that the string of firings of Coaches of the Year within 2 years after winning the award is noteworthy, it would be better to discuss it in the article NBA Coach of the Year Award with reference to sources, rather than announcing in the article title that this is a "curse" -- an opinion which could be taken as either bias or original research. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:41, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If only bias/or had speedy reasons. Alas... &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 00:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Unwikified made up something-something. Carrite (talk) 03:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete A random statistical coincidence seen in the past vaguely defined few years does not seem to warrant an article. Jaqphule (talk) 19:01, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.