Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Warhead"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 01:47, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

&quot;Warhead&quot;

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article contains speculation about a proposed but never made non-canonical James Bond film. The only ref is the name of a book. No pages link there. Reywas92 Talk 22:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Merge with Never Say Never Again as this was simply an early version of that script, OR Merge with Thunderball (film) as this was a remake of that film (as was NSNA). Sources are available for this (The Bond Files by Andy Lane and other books on Bond), but I don't see a need to have this as a separate article. In the event it's kept, lose the quotation marks in the title (may need a DAB chaser). 23skidoo (talk) 07:02, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep reliable sourcing should be available, just quickly searching I've found this (quite comprehensive) and this (brief mention)and I imagine there is more out there. The book referenced in the article (The Battle for Bond) also appears to be a reasonable source. Details about the movie/ legal struggles are already included in several Wikipedia articles including Kevin McClory, Thunderball (novel), Thunderball (film) and Never Say Never Again so whether to keep an independent article or have the title redirect somewhere perhaps with a link from this disambiguation page would be an editorial decision. Guest9999 (talk) 18:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  18:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TravellingCari  04:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Keep It is important to have information on wikipedia that people would be interested in and fans of James Bond would find this interesting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazyla112 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks reliable sources. miniluv (talk) 10:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep the decades-long legal struggle over this thing has been the subject of enormous media attention and even a book. Notable enough by far. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment- except most of that is covered in the Thunderball articles (or was, last time I looked). 23skidoo (talk) 14:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.