Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"memory in astrology"

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was copyvio. – ABCD 01:48, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

"memory in astrology"
Either original research or copyvio - not to mention how poorly-formatted and badly-named it is DS 16:44, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * It's a copyvio of this bit of choice gibberish written by somebody called Tracy Porter. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 16:49, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - I've put a note on the user's talk page asking her to stop creating articles like this, with quotes, and cautioning her (I assume it's a her) that they'll get deleted. But this one is particularly silly and doesn't deserve a second chance. - DavidWBrooks 17:29, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - the editor claims to be the original creator - original research. Guettarda 23:48, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - copyvio or original research, either way it's not suitable. Average Earthman 07:51, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Charles Matthews 08:32, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.