Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"oceanic flight 815"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Merge with Oceanic Flight 815  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) 23:32, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

"oceanic flight 815"
Looks like fancruft from Lost fans. Assuming anybody wants to keep it, it should probably be renamed to something along the lines of Oceanic Airlines Flight 815 or something similar. Delete. - Corbin Simpson 02:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC) After taking another look at the page, I'm changing my suggestion to move to Oceanic Airlines Flight 815. There's been a serious amount of improvement, and it doesn't look as much like a fan page. It needs to be moved. - Corbin Simpson 21:07, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete lostcruft and original research. Movementarian 04:01, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep cleaned up and moved version. Movementarian 10:09, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Movementarian DrIdiot 04:26, 7 January 2006 (UTC) Keep - article has been revamped DrIdiot 21:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete irrelevant material --Timecop 05:57, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Lost (TV series) --Ajdz 07:00, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: If you didn't do so before, scroll down to the bottom of the page... - Corbin Simpson 08:28, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: The above comment is worthless now as the offending paragraph has been removed. - Corbin Simpson 21:07, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nomination. Perhaps the "cry for help" at the bottom would fit at BJAODN. All the encyclopaedic content that fit Wikipedia is already in the Lost TV series article. Scoo 09:34, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep rename and clean up. Not really cruft as its the crash which establishes the whole series. 30,000 google hits -- Astrokey44 |talk 10:17, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. That article is useless. However, perhaps a new, better named, and more encylcopedic artilce can be created....  Ban  e  s  12:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC) Keep Hugely improved.  Ban  e  s  06:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to either Lost (TV series) or Oceanic Airlines  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) 12:28, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Oceanic Airlines.[[Image:Weather rain.png]] Soothing R  15:05, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and then delete per Soothing rain. Ifnord 16:17, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to Oceanic flight 815. It violates naming conventions, but may be too large to merge in the the Lost article.  xaosflux  Talk  / CVU  18:16, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I moved it per above, because yes, it does violate naming conventions. AFD link has been corrected accordingly. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 22:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep It has had considerable cleanup, and has been moved to new name; Appears nominator has withdrawn as well. There is too much information to merge in to Lost, and there appears to be room for growth.  xaosflux  Talk  / CVU  05:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Oceanic Airlines Dustimagic 19:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename. Has too much specific content to really merge into Oceanic Airlines or Lost. Turnstep 22:42, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Nomination has been withdrawn. -- JJay 22:49, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep not sure if my vote counts seeing as I made the page but I know why the original vote to delete it was cast, I do feel however that it is now just like any encyclopedic entry and has been truly cleaned up I also feel it is a genuine article and should not be merged with oceanic airlines or lost as for one it is to big and secondly it is specificly about the crash and the theories surrounding the plane itself Jezabelda 01:03, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) --NaconKantari 00:36, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article is undergoing cleanup, has been moved to a more appropriate title, and seems to be notable, at least in the context of the fictional TV series. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 01:31, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - has been improved. --Loopy e 21:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.