Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"scott j bleakley"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Scott J. Bleakley
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Probable non notable as only known because he is CEO of company that seems non notable but i am not sure so I am filing an AfD Anonymous101 (talk) 14:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: no proof of notability. Tons of sources are listed at the bottom, but none of them are about Bleakley!  Nyttend (talk) 14:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:BLP. None of the sources given are legitimate (as noted they're about different people!!!), the creator of the article has only one contribution -- and this is it. No way to tell what information here is accurate, and the use of bogus references completely destroys any confidence I have in the accuracy or "good faith" of this article. Lose it. The only reason I'm not speedy deleting it myself is because the AFD process has begun. 23skidoo (talk) 15:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * A7 Absolutely no assertation of notability. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probable self-promotion. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * delete with extreme prejudice. CEO of a non-notable company makes him very non-notable. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N Artene50 (talk) 09:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.