Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"the jennings effect"

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Dmcdevit·t 07:32, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

"the jennings effect"
A non-notable meme first uttered less than an hour prior to the creation of the article. Zoe 23:03, August 9, 2005 (UTC) Another page created two days later [Jennings Effect] attracted no such discussion. Interesting ...
 * Delete. If that doesn't classify as a neologism, I don't know what does. --IByte 23:44, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A massive thousand people movement within a day?, and how would you even know if a person (neverless 1000 people) quit smoking in that time?  &rarr;ub&#949;r n&#949;mo &rarr;  lóquï 23:51, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious neologism Soltak 23:52, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wishful thinking. -- BD2412 talk 01:00, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Osomec 06:24, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as day-old neologism.  ral  315  14:40, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into Peter Jennings. Many people indeed have quit smoking following the death of Peter Jennings (for example, this news article ), but I'm not sure this needs its own article. --Revolución (talk) 00:16, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * This page did not assert that thousands of people quits smoking, it simply said discussion of quitting was higher. Also, this page clearly makes the page in question obsolete, as it is better written and less presumptuos.  Before someone suggests it, no redirect, because who is going to type in "The Jennings Effect", before Jennings Effect.  &rarr;ub&#949;r n&#949;mo &rarr;  lóquï 15:58, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.