Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/$50,000 a Minute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

$50,000 a Minute

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Absolutely no secondary sources found. Only sources are fansites. Searches for "$50,000 a Minute" turned up only false positives, and nothing at all when keywords were added. Pilots that never aired are almost inherently non-notable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:17, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * --> Fails WP:RS and WP:N. Only ref is not reliable. Ikluft (talk) 03:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. A failed pilot might be notable if it was unique or groundbreaking in some way - but something truly unique would either have been picked up or would be too gimmicky to matter. But that doesn't matter, really, if there are no reliable sources about that pilot - which is the case here. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:43, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete – Fails notability, no sources; same arguments as above. Sottolacqua (talk) 17:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable, no reliable sources; I can't see how a failed pilot would be notable, Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  20:52, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.