Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/'76 Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. The SandDoctor Talk 04:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

'76 Press

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This publishing company doesn't seem to be notable. There's only three sources in the article and one of them might work for notability. Although it's questionable. While the other two are a blog entry and a link to one of their books. Neither of which establish the companies notability. I couldn't find multiple in-depth reliable sources about in a WP:BEFORE either. Outside of that, it seems like the main purpose of the article is to be a directory listing of archive.org links to what they have published and Wikipedia isn't a directory. So the article seems to fail WP:GNG, WP:NCORP, and also the standard of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Adamant1 (talk) 09:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (talk) 09:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (talk) 09:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.