Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/'Jimmy Don't Leave Me / Go Away Rebecca-Sue!'


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete. Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 03:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

'Jimmy Don't Leave Me / Go Away Rebecca-Sue!'

 * — (View AfD)

This sentence fragment is certainly not an article, and mentions (but does not describe) an entirely non-notable single. ➥the Epopt 04:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd go speedy, but can't fidn a good reason.  --Dennisthe2 06:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Failure to establish notability. —ShadowHalo 06:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd say redirect it to the artist page, which contains better info, but this is an unlikely search term. GassyGuy 06:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 08:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: whether delete or not, we need to educate the initial writer how to select a good topic and write a good article. --Deryck C. 10:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Question Is it too late to bundle 'Baby Darling / My Love Loves Lovin' with this deletion? GassyGuy 12:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yep. Separate AFD. --Dennisthe2 23:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's just to short and doesn't have enough content to significantly inform someone. One speedy could be the "empty" one Dennisthe2.Danielfolsom 19:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Good enough. Change to Speedy Delete as empty. --Dennisthe2 00:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.