Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/'t Muziek Frascati


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- jonny - m t  16:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

&

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable DimaG (talk) 01:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think it just needs clean-up thats all. Fattyjwoods  ( Push my button  ) 01:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable. Mrprada (talk) 03:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't read flemish and/or dutch... But a quick Google Search: turns up almost NO reliable sources save other language Wikis and mirrors... There does not appear to be any independent reliable sources about this group... --Jayron32. talk . contribs  03:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per jayron32.  iM at  th ew   20  08  11:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: The problem is that it doesn't seem to actually be a group.  It's an outreach effort and program within an organization, I think.  Therefore, whatever the parent organization is, that's where this information would belong.  Utgard Loki (talk) 16:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It would seem to be an actual group, just one that does said outreach programs. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 04:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hers fold  (t/a/c) 04:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Sitting on fence at the moment. The editor appears to only edit infrequently and is contributing to an underrepresented area of Wikipedia (classical music), and doesn't appear to have edited since this AfD. It doesn't look spammy and may well have other offline references we can't access. I am also thoughtful it may help balance systemic bias. My inclination would be to close as no consensus and give it a couple of months for the editor to find some sources. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete My Dutch (Vlaams, please) is not that great, but if you look at the press references they list on their website (in de pers), it seems pretty meagre. Beyond that, an occasional concert listing. I'd say Delete as not-notable. Sadly, WP:MUSIC doesn't fit the classical genre very well; but if it did, this would be below threshold (in my view at least). Eusebeus (talk) 15:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Though I am native in Dutch, I couldn't find much in the way of independent reliable sources on this amateur music ensamble. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 00:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Though I am sensitive to the concerns of systemic bias, there has evidently been a good faith effort to find verification of notability here, and I am particularly persuaded by the arguments of Martijn Hoekstra, who would presumably be well able to evaluate what sources exist. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.