Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/(40271) 1999 JT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List_of_minor_planets:_40001-41000. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

(40271) 1999 JT

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article adds nothing beyond what the associated List of minor planets: 40001–41000 already gives, nothing in the article establishes notability and I was unable to find any reason why this particular minor planet is notable. ReformedArsenal (talk) 13:36, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete right out of WP:NASTRO, specifically #Dealing with minor planets.  " Pepper "  @ 22:17, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to appropriate list.AstroCog (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree. These seem to be coming up a lot, and it generally ends the same way: redirect. AstroCog (talk) 12:48, 26 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect in the absence of publications giving detailed and particular attention to this particular minor planet, per WP:NASTRO. All we currently have is a database entry, and that's not enough: "Just because an object is listed in a database does not mean it is notable." Possibly snow redirect because I don't think we should really have to go through this same discussion for each of the many non-notable robot-created articles like this that we already have. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of minor planets: 40001-41000. Redirects are cheap, and the convention has been to redirect non-notable minor planets to the parent list.-- xanchester  (t)  19:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect, per Xanchester. I couldn't find any sources to establish notability. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  09:28, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.