Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/(I Got That) Boom Boom 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to In the Zone. Black Kite 22:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

(I Got That) Boom Boom
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Two Britney Spears articles for songs that fail WP:NSONGS. No notability other than the fact that she recorded them and perhaps sang them live at one point. One was a "rumored" single, the other canceled. No videos or chart action... these are just album tracks with no stand-alone notability. Can easily be merged. In fact, both were nominated previously in 2007 and results were delete/redirect and somewhere along the way they were recreated. See also Articles for deletion/Breathe on Me. - eo (talk) 10:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's too much unsourced, trivial information on these pages.  If everything was reduced to notable, sourced info, it would simply be the fact that both were possibly scheduled to be singles but cancelled after her accident.  Is there even a legit source stating that these songs were upcoming singles?? SKS (talk) 16:05, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep & Redirect. Keep the Breathe on Me article and merge some of the (I Got That) Boom Boom content into Breathe on Me article and then redirect (I Got That) Boom Boom to In the Zone page (or even delete it), what 'bout that?. 77.46.225.180 (talk) 11:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Breathe on Me must stay, its contents make it notable, maybe it hasn't charted but it's a well-known song, it should stay, I don't understand why some people want to delete everythin they see. And Boom Boom is also notable, it's her first rap collaboration, but if you wish to delete it, then move some of its contents to Breathe on Me page and then redirect or delete (I Got That) Boom Boom. PlatinumFire (talk) 11:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment how exactly does "Breathe on Me"'s contents make it notable? It's mostly a bunch of critic review quotes, no doubt taken from a larger review of the entire album.  It's all speculation: "...the song is sometimes considered as a single from In the Zone..."  For "Boom Boom", a singer/rapper collaboration is hardly something notable or out-of-the-ordinary if it wasn't a big hit. - eo (talk) 12:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment if Boom Boom was released as a single it would be a hit and don't underestimate the song's popularity. And Breathe on Me is much more popular worldwide since all these speculations, tour performances and remixes. PlatinumFire (talk) 20:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment where are the sources to back up these claims? we can't create articles based on "what if"'s. - eo (talk) 21:11, 29 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect. Redirect both to the album In the Zone that they appear in.  --Igoldste (talk) 21:17, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect both to In the Zone. Never released as singles (being "planned" doesn't establish notability), no covers, awards or chart activity. Just because a song is popular with fans does not mean that it should have its own Wikipedia article. (And trust me, I love Britney...but these songs are simply not notable.) talking  birds  16:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. And what about the fact that Breathe on Me was performed on every tour since then and used for commercials and had a radio release, does that make the song notable. And you said there are no sources -- you should then check That's Where You Take Me and I've Just Begun (Having My Fun)! -- Platinum  Fire  21:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete both. Fail WP:NSONGS. No need for redirect, especially in the case of Boom. What an unlikely search term. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.