Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/+X


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Garrix discography. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:57, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

+X

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The page was previously deleted for failing requirements, it is now recreated but still has not met the requirements. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 07:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)


 *  Redirect - Without sufficient reliable sources as to a title, track listing or release date, +X should be redirected to Garrix or Garrix discography per WP:CHEAP. Because there are articles at, ,  and Capital TV, this and/or its lower case equivalent are very likely to be valid search terms.  Furthermore, as of now, the two terms have averaged more than 90 hits per month. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:29, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 *  Comment -, when was +X (or +x) deleted? --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - I remember nominating the same article for deletion few months ago, I assumed it was deleted. Redirection would be a good idea but there is no evidence to prove that +X is the confirmed album title. It could be something else, which is why, a deletion would be appropriate. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 14:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 *  Reply  - I recommend, that FOR NOW, +X be kept, as this is what is listed at Capital TV. If the album title changes, we can discuss complete deletion then. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Reply - Two issues - album title not known and no reliable sources. We will just leave this deletion talk page alone for the admins to decide but for now please do not add any unsourced content regarding +x which may not even be the album title and there's no sources to back your claim. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 23:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * and others – for info, the first AfD is here: Articles for deletion/+×


 * Redirect - Per Jax's rationale.  Ss 112  20:33, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Speculation about this supposed album has been present on Wikipedia for more than a year, but nothing reliable ever supported the speculation. Binksternet (talk) 21:38, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 *  Redirect  per above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 19:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 *  Comment - FYI, it is now October 24, and AFAIK, the album has still not been released. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.