Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/¡Tré!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. It looks like there is consensus not to delete, but no consensus as to whether the article should be kept or merged. I suggest opening a merge discussion on the talk page. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

¡Tré!

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Whatever written here is clear copy of what I've written at ¡Uno! and there is no difference other then one or two lines which are either unsourced or unnecessary. Track listing is not released and nor has been any confirmation of songs from the album or singles. It is best to salt this and redirect to Green Day for now. Though not failing GNG, it is clearly copy of other article. It is WP:TOOSOON and I can do much better with this once there are more details out.  TheSpecialUser TSU 06:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I think it's clear by the sources the album exists in some fashion and will be publicly available in a few short months. While the "word-for-word" thing is a problem, it's also easily corrected. I believe this article passes the necessary policies (WP:GNG, WP:N, WP:NALBUM) to continue to exist. The album work has been released and was previously on the article prior to it's redirection, which I undid. In short, keep, it more than meets the necessary policies to be kept. Just needs a re-write to keep it from being a word-for-word copy of another article.  CRRays Head90  | Get Some! 06:57, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem with changing words but can you add more info to differ the article, like 21st and AI are? Even if changed wording, the meaning remains the same as it is in UNO. It is impossible as there are no details available out there, right now.  TheSpecialUser TSU 07:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * They're part of a trilogy all announced at once. A lot of the information will be the same, it is inevitable.  CRRays Head90  | Get Some! 07:12, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It's about time that both Tre and Dos have a wiki page, we know a lot about the albums already, even some of the songs have been confirmed, so there can be a partial track listing (just without numbers). For example we know 99 Revolutions is going to be on Tre as well as Stray Heart. The first confirmed in an interview when they first announced the trilogy and the latter during the radio interview with Zane Lowe. Also in the end all three of the wiki pages will end up very similar anyway, and its just a starting ground right now. Cruiseshipfan (talk) 11:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Green Day for now. The album is definitely scheduled for release, and some details are known about it (cover art, names of a couple tracks) but it's still too soon to have a stand-alone article. As the release draws closer one expects more sources and info will become available, at which point it can be un-redirected and expanded. --IllaZilla (talk) 21:13, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect/merge to Green Day. Much of ¡Tré!'s "Recording and release" section is identical to that of the ¡Uno! article. Understandable, but it also shows - along with no confirmed track listing - that there's little individual notability for ¡Tré! at this time, and that it'd be sensible to wait a bit for more specifics to emerge.  Gongshow  Talk 08:04, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect/merge to Green Day. Until there's are tracklistings that are confirmed by the band themselves, Dos and Tre don't need articles. Alec scheat (talk) 09:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Either Redirect or Clean it Up we should either fix it up add a picture and have a short article on it or wait until after Dos comes out and make the article then and have it redirect for now Black Dragon  01:44, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Now This page has been cleaned up and now features a cover and tracklist so we should keep it being that is what we said was needed to keep it and it has the themes and styles added Black Dragon  20:40, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. We got a title, release date, album cover and track listing for the album. More information will come in time, but this is enough for now. Zac   09:27, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.