Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/¡Uno! ¡Dos! ¡Tré! Trilogy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Green Day. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 00:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

¡Uno! ¡Dos! ¡Tré! Trilogy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Contested PROD. The gist of the 3 albums is already detailed at Green Day, and we already have articles for each individual album at ¡Uno!, ¡Dos!, and ¡Tré!. this article adds nothing and is totally redundant. IllaZilla (talk) 18:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete/Redirect - The information collectively should be shown at the band's article, and individually will be covered when each album has it's own article. That makes this article redundant. Sergecross73   msg me   01:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Green Day as a possible search-term.  Lugnuts  And the horse 07:33, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect - whatever happened to being bold? Cyan Gardevoir  (used EDIT!) 09:41, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the relevant section on the Green Day page.  Jasper420
 * Delete - no one's gonna search with the reversed !. The Mad Hatter (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.