Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Álvaro Moerzinger (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Álvaro Moerzinger
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:BIO. no inherent notability in any of his positions. a mere 3 gnews hits which just confirmed he held an ambassador position LibStar (talk) 01:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC) comment this user is now blocked. LibStar (talk) 03:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep and Cleanup From the very little information looks like this subject might indeed be notable, but there simply isn't enough sources to back up the claim and support his notability as of right now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KindleReader (talk • contribs) 01:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * that sounds ridiculous. A lack of sources is a reason for deletion. LibStar (talk) 13:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete we lack the sources to show notability, diplomats, even ambassadors, are never default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anoptimistix   "Message Me"  05:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - not nearly enough in-depth coverage to show that this diplomat passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per John Pack Lambert. Being a diplomat isn't inherently notable, and the article has no other claim of notability, nor any claim of meeting WP:GNG.  Google searches don't give any indication of meeting GNG either. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 06:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.