Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ángel Abrea (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Ángel Abrea
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources independent of the organization from which he draws his notability. p b  p  14:04, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep The Encyclopedia of Latter-day Saint history is independent of the subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:32, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:16, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:16, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:17, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete – Does not meet WP:BASIC, as per my previous nomination at Articles for deletion/Ángel Abrea (2nd nomination). No adequate evidence of notability was provided at that time. One source that might possibly provide significant coverage is not enough. Multiple independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage are required, not just one that may possibly have the required depth-of-coverage, or maybe not. Furthermore, there is no presumed notability for religious subjects on English Wikipedia. The subject may be important in the LDS church, but is not notable as per Wikipedia's standards of notability at this time. North America1000 17:40, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 23:30, 4 August 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 04:49, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as per comments above and in the prior nomination decision. Bondegezou (talk) 10:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.