Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ángel Mena


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 17:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Ángel Mena

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:55, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:56, 27 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 08:50, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (confess)  @ 16:17, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 06:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG. Ryan Fernandez G. (talk) 02:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 10:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – Presently fails WP:NFOOTY (called up for 🇪🇨 ecuador but did not play; currently plays in top-level league not recognized as a WP:FPL), and only WP:ROUTINE coverage fails WP:GNG. This is a case of WP:TOOSOON. — Jkudlick t c s 03:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.