Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Çağla Baktıroğlu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Çağla Baktıroğlu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Continued disruption (removal of PRODS) by User:‎Hmlarson. A clear violation of WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  06:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  06:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  06:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  06:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that, because NHOCKEY does not mention any women's ice hockey leagues, that women who play professional ice hockey in women's leagues cannot be considered notable under NHOCKEY? — This, that and the other (talk) 01:11, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: As long as being a hockey player is the sole stated premise of a subject's notability, yes, indeed, failure to meet NHOCKEY's a valid reason to delete. It's also true that the GNG supersedes NHOCKEY, but since neither Hmlarson nor anyone else has presented evidence that the subject can meet it, no article on her can be sustained. The reason that NHOCKEY accords no presumptive notability to women's leagues (save for women playing in the Olympics) has been exhaustively discussed on the talk pages of WP:NHOCKEY/LA, WP:NSPORTS and the hockey WikiProject, but they simply boil down to that nowhere in the world does women's hockey receive a level of coverage sufficient to presumptively declare every player in the league notable.  Given that this is a standard issue throughout women's team sport -- the WNBA is the only women's team sport league in the world that is credited with presumptive notability -- this should be no great surprise.   Ravenswing   11:57, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NHOCKEY No indication of wide GNG. Article is well referenced, however all sources are essentially databases, stat sites, brief routine mentions or primary sources. Would challenge other editors to provide a single instance of a significant, dedicated article on the player that might be used to support GNG. This looks like it might be a start (though I would need to see more in order to be happy GNG is met) but I can't get the page to load. Fenix down (talk) 08:56, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Summed up pretty well already. I can find nothing anywhere that indicates they meet the WP:GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 12:46, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.