Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Çağrı Haksöz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 19:46, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Çağrı Haksöz

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to sufficiently establish notability. Does not appear to pass WP:ACADEMIC, WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. J04n(talk page) 00:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 00:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 00:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 00:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete, seems to be an ordinary non-notable academic. Markiewp (talk) 06:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, lovely CV, but not worth an article here.--Karljoos (talk) 13:34, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree, this is basically the CV of a junior academic whose most likely purpose is career-oriented WP:PROMOTION, as it seems to have been created by the subject. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 16:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete in the absence of evidence that he passes WP:PROF. The level of citation to his work in Google scholar seems well below the usual standard for passing criterion #1, and there's no sign that he meets any of the other criteria either. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:21, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Citability is low and nothing else in the record to indicate passing WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 14:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Lionel (talk) 03:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.