Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Édith Scob


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. As noted below "Unreferenced" isn't anywhere near a valid reason for deletion, Clearly BEFORE wasn't followed. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 15:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Édith Scob

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

unreferenced Rathfelder (talk) 18:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * referenced now. Inwind (talk) 04:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone  09:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone  09:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone  09:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, unreferenced is not a valid reason for deletion, obvious lack of WP:BEFORE. Also obviously notable (two times César Award winner, among other things), passes WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO and WP:ENT. --Cavarrone  09:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep for sad lack of WP:BEFORE. Notable awards meet WP:ANYBIO. Career meets WP:ENT. Coverage meets WP:GNG. It is really incredibly easy to quickly find coverage for this notable person. IE: The Guardian, NJ.com, Sydney Morning Herald, Les Inrocks (French), RTL (French), Ecran Noir {French), El Pais (French), and many, MANY more..  I appreciate the nom having a great concern that the BLP was unsourced, but it would have been far better to do just a little work himself than to bring it to AFD to force it be done by others.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 12:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.