Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ÏCE Condominiums at York Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

ÏCE Condominiums at York Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NBUILD and WP:GNG. A condo complex in a city with a surfeit of such. Brief mentions in reputable media such as The Globe and Mail re: its allegedly huge number of Airbnb units, but no in-depth coverage of the building or its architecture. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 20:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 20:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 20:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * leaning delete If there were a number of articles such as that used to cite the claim that "the towers have become a symbol for Toronto's housing market crisis", there would be more of an argument for keeping this, but one use as an example is not enough to justify this, and what else I'm seeing is not especially important. Mangoe (talk) 23:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * WP:other stuff exists. It's a lot bigger and more western than tons of other non notable buildings with articles. B137 (talk) 00:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFF is an instance of an argument to avoid in deletion discussions, not a point in favour of keeping this article. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 00:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The building was nominated for the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat Award for Best Tall Buildings Americas for its use of sustainable architectural design. That would seem to meet criteria 2 of WP:NBUILD. See page 267. Additionally, there are other sources in google books with coverage.4meter4 (talk) 22:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  00:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Google mostly brings up articles about stuff happening in the buildings, noting about why they're notable. Toronto has lots of tall buildings, most aren't notable. Oaktree b (talk) 00:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Lots of buildings get nominated for awards by industry groups. I do not think this project is notable. Alaney2k (talk) 18:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.