Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Óscar Uzcátegui


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete both Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Óscar Uzcátegui

 * – ( View AfD View log )



This is not the subject of substantial coverage by multiple independent reliable sources. He fails as to WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:ACADEMIC. I found a few trivial mentions in a handful of languages, but substantial coverage and citations were confined to the subject himself and associates like Samael Aun Weor. JFHJr (㊟) 02:24, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I'd also like to add the related Gnostic Association of Anthropological, Cultural and Scientific Studies.




 * It also fails general notability criteria, and independent coverage does not approach WP:CORPDEPTH. JFHJr (㊟) 04:42, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete both. From RSN: .  But why weren't both of them just prodded before going to AFD?  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 15:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * FWIW I didn't PROD because the GNAACSS page was previously subject to VfD in 2004 before it was retitled (result was keep), and thought it best to bundle these related articles. I prefer not to PROD after a prior AfD, and particularly since the result was previously keep at AfD, I thought AfD was the best place to request deletion. JFHJr (㊟) 22:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:32, 4 March 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete both Not notable enough. FurrySings (talk) 14:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete both, neither appear to have anything like general notability as established by independent RS, just a whole bunch of self-generated hype, You Tube, Facebook and all the usual suspects.  Captain Screebo Parley! 18:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.