Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Übernet

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus, so keep --Allen3 talk 13:27, August 4, 2005 (UTC)

Übernet
Some anonymous editor put this up for speedy deletion and while I don't think it fits that criteria I am not sure it is notable. I looked at the ubernet site and everything and I can't tell whether this article is self-promotion or what. In any case it is not notable as it is just a small community of audio-likers. It's not nearly as as well known as hydrogenaudio.org or the like and I fail to see any reason why it's encyclopedic. Ubernet which is a redirect page to this should also suffer the same outcome as this article. gren 22:18, 24 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete gren 22:16, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Ubernet is well known in the audiophile filesharing community. I'm not a member, but they're relevant. --malathion talk 00:10, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Well, I put the article up, it could certainly use some fleshing out. Their website is not that infomative, but my friend tells me that the network is fairly large.  I beleive one of the requirements to join is to rip a certain number of cds according to their specifications.  I find the idea interesting, and would hope that people that know more could add to the article, but I shall let the community decide if it belongs here. [I am not associted with Übernet] --Terrible Tim 16:28, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Ubernet is smaller than most direct connect hubs and the only thing it has going for it is that people don't know much about it. Which, seems to be against what is encyclopedic.  I mean, the only source is their site and what users or people who have heard from users would have to say.  Which seems a little odd because it can't be more than hearsay at that point.  gren 17:02, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I certianly agree that not every DC hub needs an article. However these people seem to be more organised, they have even released their own client based on DC.  The reason I wrote the article was because I wanted to know more about them, but Wikipedia had no article.--Terrible Tim 22:49, 25 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete advertising. JamesBurns 07:29, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Factually incorrect. Übernet ceased their P2P activities.  Maeka 01:04, 04 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Users second edit. --Allen3 talk 13:27, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.