Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Üqoi (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies.  MBisanz  talk 13:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Üqoi
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This does not seem to be a notable conlang. Professorjohnas (talk) 08:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 11:31, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree. I tried to find material to expand the article, but wasn't able to find much. The creator's page is only available using archive.org, and there's no evidence that Üqoi was ever picked up by a broader community or systematized. Delete. --Quantum7 09:07, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * BTW, I created the current stub based on the assumption that omniglot entries would have some notability. After further research I think that's not the case. --Quantum7 09:12, 6 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. One sentence and no refs. Szzuk (talk) 07:51, 12 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.