Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Đukić (Sandžak)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:35, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Đukić (Sandžak)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Pure Original research, none of the sources mention anything linked to Đukić (Sandžak), which is an article about the Muslim families of the Đukić brotherhood (which includes Serbs, Christians), itself part of the Vasojevići clan (see the first paragraph in the history section, pure OR with no scholarly refs). There is a list of people supposedly part of this Đukić (Sandžak)-family, but with no sources. No notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoupan (talk • contribs) 18:06, 3 July 2012‎ (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. Z oupan  02:07, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Z oupan  02:07, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 01:54, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to Đukić, dropping any original research. -- JHunterJ (talk) 15:35, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Đukić is a disambiguation page, and since Đukić (Sandžak) is OR - nothing should be moved. I added "*Đukić, a brotherhood of the Vasojevići" to the disambiguation page.--Z oupan 09:23, 8 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominator.--Z oupan 09:23, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nominator's arguments. The text consists of manifest nonsense and OR. I found only one acceptable statement in it: "Vasojevic tribe was first mentioned in 1444." Vladimir  (talk) 15:34, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator's reasons. Article does not exactly establish the notability of this name without WP:RS. --Artene50 (talk) 23:41, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.