Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/İrmaşlı Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a copyright violation of copyrighted non-free content by Samvel Karapetyan ("© Samvel Karapetian, 2007") and Afghan Khalilli, janked wholesale by entire paragrahps and copied into Wikipedia. I thought of a possible explanation, and allowed a day for an explanation to be forthcoming. From HulaguKaan's response that possibility clearly is not the case. Böyük Qaramurad Monastery by the same account was copied and pasted wholesale, too. Uncle G (talk) 22:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

İrmaşlı Church

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BUILDING. Sourced mostly from blog posts, no serious sourcing to provide notability for these ruins. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 21:26, 30 June 2019 (UTC)


 * , not only blogs, but only academic RAA is also used as a source. The fact is that there is a ruin of old temple, but i am aware that there are few sources, as it needs more investigation. So i think we should keep it, may it could be interesting for people who do not speak Armenian or Azerbaijani HulaguKaan (talk) 22:18, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Afghan Khalilli, whoever that is, used it as a source. You, first person voice, grammatical errors, and all.  Then  Samvel Karapetyan wholesale too.  Please explain why I should not delete this on sight for being in blatant violation of our Copyright policy.  Copying and pasting is not writing.  Copying and pasting other people's copyrighted non-free writing into Wikipedia is antithetical to the goals of the project.  Uncle G (talk) 23:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Why the rhetorical question? If it's copyvio then we should push to speedily delete. There would be almost no substance to the article with the offending text removed. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 23:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * This is neither rhetorical, nor indeed coming down on either of you like a tonne of bricks. Think about that.  Uncle G (talk) 00:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * That note was specifically referring to the message you left on my talk page, but your wider point is taken. The article should be speedied in any case. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 00:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Which wasn't coming down on you like a tonne of bricks either. Another thing for you to think about: I am an adminstrator, and could have deleted this on sight.  But instead, having done some investigation, I am asking the editor for an explanation, first.  Uncle G (talk) 00:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , please calm down, i feel that you wrote whatever you said with some hysteria. If you see grammatical errors you can fix it, it would be more polite and helpful. I have tried to fix errors. if still there are some errors, please help me to fix them too. I think the idea is to share information, not to delete them due the "bureaucratism". — Preceding unsigned comment added by HulaguKaan (talk • contribs) 2019-07-01T13:39:09 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly notable historic building which would obviously be heritage listed if it was in a Western country even if it isn't by Azerbaijan. Copyvio is another issue, but is the topic notable? Yes. . -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.