Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Œīîto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:A7. North America1000 09:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Œīîto

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable translator. Can't find a single thing about him. Do not send to draft unless encyclopaedic merit can be proved. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG as far as I can tell from a WP:BEFORE search. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and BIO --Assyrtiko (talk) 10:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. No indication of notability. fails WP:GNG. DJRSD (talk) 10:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per criterion A7. An article with this content, by the same creator, has already been deleted at Ñósíït and Draft:Ñósíït; at this point it is pure disruption. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 10:11, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: Clear A7.  Java Hurricane  10:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The creator of this page has been creating articles about unnotable topics. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 10:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks notability, likely a hoax? Fixing26 (talk) 14:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - I agree with CSD A7 as well. A S U K I T E  15:33, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I found this via Special:NewPagesFeed, and was about to tag as A7 until I saw this AfD. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 16:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as likely hoax. I can't find any info about this person at all. The reference doesn't add up as well. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 13:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I investigated the book listed as a reference after I posted above, but I didn't bother posting about it since consensus is clear enough. The Philippine Bible Society is a legitimate organization that publishes Bibles in the Philippines, and the ISBN is in the proper format for books published in the Philippines, but the specific book claimed as a source doesn't appear to exist, by that title or with that ISBN. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 01:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree that PBS is a legitimate organization and I've seen their products in various bookstores here. "Œīîto" and this reference's existence is questionable though. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 04:54, 4 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 02:28, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: Per WP:A7. 70 results on Google? Even the article name sounds fishy. Those letters do not typically exist in Filipino names.  Hiwilms   Talk   18:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete the creator has been indefinitely blocked. Two near-identical articles from a ‘new’ editor were speedy deleted yesterday. Mccapra (talk) 07:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.