Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Şahane Sultan Müftüoğlu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Şahane Sultan Müftüoğlu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable academician nor a notable politician. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:23, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - 43000 hits suggests some notability. She is not notable as an academic but as a political figure. Turkish political figures seem to come and go and come back again - the reality being that people of seemingly minor importance can actually be very important. BTW, the "malicious accusations" mentioned in the article was a smear campaign directed against the leader of the [People's Ascent Party] in which she was accused of having an affair with him. I think it would be OK to mention that more fully in the article - even though it is a BLP she has written about the accusation. She is an opponent of Erdogan and his political Islam and his re-Islamisation of Turkey, though her politics seems on the surface to be backward and obsolete (it's all part of an imperialist plot against Turkey and our Great Leader Ataturk stuff). Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 15:09, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment-1 She is not a notable academician because she has not written even one page of anything academic. She is not notable as a politician because she (and her party) has not received even 1 percent of votes in any election. This is why, possibly, she wrote her own bio. (On the other hand there are several really notable people with the same surname.) The search hits are related to the claimed love affair of a married man where her name has been referred to frequently. Even that indirect notability (the news were about the man, a respected university prof, nobody knew her before) was a one-time event. So until another scandal she is not notable. Full stop. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 07:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment-2 (for the concerned user) If you have nothing better to do in life than follow me to pages that had no interest for you before, go ahead, but please do not add your POV nonsense to these pages. WP is not a forum; I am sure you may find a suitable one for yourself in the internet and fight against others there. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 07:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 21:18, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of notability as either an academic or politician. Tiller54 (talk) 18:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete She's not notable as a politician or academic and lacks the coverage required by GNG. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 01:39, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.