Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Şehzade Mahmud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Suleiman the Magnificent.  Go  Phightins  !  18:16, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Şehzade Mahmud

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability Miszatomic (Talk) 16:23, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Absolutely no references; fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Notability is not inherited. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 01:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep He is on Turkish Wikipedia . Sources for notability are on paper not the Web. I am One of Many (talk) 05:28, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  23:28, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - Fails GNG. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  01:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - I added a reliable source. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 08:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Suleiman the Magnificent. Normally the progeny of monarchs have some limited claim to notability by virtue of being "blood royal," but this article doesn't pass muster. The subject died in childhood and what we have is a two sentence stub with little realistic hope of expansion into an encyclopedic article. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Suleiman the Magnificent. If, at some future time, sufficient information and reliable sources come to light, recreate at that time.  -- RoySmith (talk) 12:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per User:Ad Orientem. Otherwise likely to remain a perpetual stub.-- Mojo Hand (talk) 15:57, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.