Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Şevket Yorulmaz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) — rsjaffe 🗣️ 15:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Şevket Yorulmaz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. No in-depth secondary coverage. Checked Turkish Wikipedia too, no in-depth coverage from sources there either. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * He was the top scorer in the Turkish league for two seasons in the 1950s and is commemorated to this day. It would be highly, highly unlikely that there aren’t contemporary/offline sources about him. One just has to look at the right places. This is the sort of nomination where one has to be really, really exhaustive when advocating deletion. —GGT (talk) 00:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've expanded the article with a bunch of sources I could locate, including an encyclopaedia article about him and a bunch of sources from a newspaper archive I could access. I'd say this is sufficient proof of him passing WP:GNG and there are obviously many more sources offline, considering that almost no works about Turkish sports history are digitised. --GGT (talk) 11:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article about a notable footballer (led his club in goal-scoring for multiple seasons) which now satisfies the GNG thanks to offline sources found by GGT. Jogurney (talk) 13:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.