Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ševčenko's law (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ihor Ševčenko. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Ševčenko's law
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An extremely low number of google hits, hence I question the notability of the "law" Staszek Lem (talk) 22:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and Merge. Nothing on GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:10, 14 July 2016 (UTC).
 * You can't delete and merge at the same time. Merge and delete Christian75 (talk) 08:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Appears not to be widely used.-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Ihor_Ševčenko and add that source where the "law" is described (though only as a passing mention). It is certainly not standalone-notable, but it does not seem undue weight in its author's article. Tigraan Click here to contact me 20:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge + redirect as per Tigraan. It does not appear to be a widely used or notable term, but I think a mention of it in the main article is appropriate. GABgab 03:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.