Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Škoda 33Tr SOR


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I am closing this delete discussion as no consensus because after two relists, consensus wasn't reached. If some editors feel that the article is some sort of WP:PROMO, they should take it up at WP:COIN. (non-admin closure)  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 00:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Škoda 33Tr SOR

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Seems to be a variant of another bus model, but the other bus model doesn't even have a page. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 02:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ~ riley  (  talk  ) 06:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete No effective referencing. Seems to be a couple of paid editors pushing Skoda bus articles on Wikipedia. Can we please add this: Škoda 32Tr SOR. Thanks.  scope_creep Talk  08:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Can we add this: Škoda 31Tr SOR and this Škoda 30Tr SOR and Škoda 14Tr and Škoda 15Tr. Thanks.  scope_creep Talk  11:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , Please do. Makes sense to take care of em all at once. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 16:07, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 15:33, 25 December 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I find this a confusing AFD. First it was about this new article that has just two refs. Then there is a comment requesting that four more bus articles be added, all with varying age (one going back to 2012) and referencing. I see no justification at all for treating all five in one AFD. Furthermore, I would never see Delete for any of them; if they could not be justified as independent articles then there should at least be Merge/Redirect to Škoda Transportation or List of Škoda Transportation products but never outright delete. There is also a comment about paid editing. That may be true, but again it doesn't apply to all five. the 14Tr and 15Tr are out of production so I don't see any possible promotional issue there. The newer articles  seem to be neutrally written. If there is a concern about promotional editing, then that is a matter for WP:COIN, not AFD. MB 03:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.