Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Štefan Gajdoš


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete WP:CSD A7, no assertion of notability, if discovering two asteroids is supposed to be notable, the article would need to say so. Tim Vickers (talk) 20:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Štefan Gajdoš

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable. Article does not even reach stub category (It is -still- just 1 sentence="Štefan Gajdoš is a Slovak astronomer", was created before 28. june, 2004 (!)), article does not even exists on the slovak wikipedia. No information found about him on the internet, article has no reference/source.  B@xter 9 13:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Do not know: but do not like AFD nominations that is not well researched and does not have any valid reasons:
 * not even stub is not a reason to delete
 * 1 sentence is not a reason to delete
 * does not exist on slovak wikipedia is not a reason to delete
 * article has no reference/source is not a reason to delete
 * no information found on the internet is not a reason and is FALSE
 * So basically not any valid argument except not notable, so is Štefan Gajdoš Notable? He gets 8 hits on google scholar for his full name and 18 for Š Gajdoš, how many of those that is his I do not know. Is that enough for WP:PROF? I do not think so, but my slovakian language skills is not really good enough to say what those papers say. --Stefan talk 14:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, sorry! I am not very familiar with wiki deletion guide (this is my first "nomination"), I saw this "article" and I thought 1 sentence is not worth enough to have a dedicated article (It could be merged into article Slovakia, part "science"). Also, I searched for him on the google, but I only found facebook accounts and other not reliable webpages... Gajdos has 53 100 hits (not sure that all of them is this person) while "hjhjhj" has 107 000 (even a youtube video:). The other stubs, like Peter Kolény and Leonard Kornoš could be merged into one article==>Slovak astronomers, not?
 * Yes correct, the page should probably be merged, but before nominating for deletion you should have read WP:DEL. You should have found WP:PROF and you should have argued from them. IF you thought the page should have been merged, why did you nominate for deletion?? Anyone can merge! You should also read WP:ATD before you nominate the next time. Sorry no offence, I just do not like drive-by-AFD's, when you nominate, do your homework. Finding a one line article and do a check on google is not enough. --Stefan talk 00:29, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I did not merge them, because I found those articles after I made this nomination. B@xter 9 06:45, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: A Google News Archive search returns a number of results that may allow Štefan Gajdoš to pass WP:BIO. Cunard (talk) 15:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Those sources are Slovak sources. All of them.(I am not saying that English sources are better than the Slovak websites) B@xter 9 18:45, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Had it existed back in 2004, the author should've read WP:PUTEFFORT. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:57, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I want to say keep here.  BTW, to the unsigned person ranting, since there are articles showing notability, you can always fix it and change my mind.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 18:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment The article borders on the line of being an A1 speedy candidate. "Foo was an astronomer."  Big deal.  There are thousands of people who think they are astronomers.  Apparently he helped discover two asteroids.  Ok.  Is that notable?  Dunno.  If not, delete, if so, hopefully someone will care enough to make this into a useful article. Resolute 22:04, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Honestly, Reso, I was twitching for an A1 myself, but there's the assertion of notability in that he ostensibly discovered two asteroids. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 05:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: If this gets deleted (which I guess it will) someone should have a look at Category:Slovak astronomers, a few more of the same type created by the same user can be found there, most one or two liners with no references or notability claims. --Stefan talk 07:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions.  —--Stefan talk 07:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.