Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Žukovska


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No further discussion of sources mentioned despite two relists and only comment later was only about one subject. Before renominating, remember that both redirecting and merging don't need a discussion here and usually can be performed per WP:BOLD.  So Why  10:35, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Žukovska

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested prod. Its tributary Balinačka Reka, with even less notability, bundled for convenience. Both articles unsourced and fail WP:GEOLAND: Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist... The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. (emphasis mine) Those are minor streams in eastern Serbia among thousands of similar ones, and no information beyond statistics can be located. The streams have one or two mentions in Gazetteers each (Žukovska Balinačka), proving only that they exist, but well short of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. No verifiable content seems possible, and anyone interested in those streams would better use a map service rather than Wikipedia. No such user (talk) 11:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. 11:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. 11:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I don't know who no such user is. The rivers are classified according to the provisions of Wikiproject Rivers. This project classifies the rivers and some may be of low importance. However, even low importance rivers can have articles. Wikiproject Rivers does NOT consider that even small creeks of low importance should be eliminated. It is confusing to use other criteria than the one of Wikiproject Rivers. I strongly object to the deletion which is not justified and is not consistent with the criteria for deletion for rivers. Afil (talk) 15:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The criteria for deletion (or retaining) of rivers are WP:GEOLAND, which is a part of the WP:Notability policy, duly linked above. I don't see anything at WP:RIVERS that specifies a different or more specific set of criteria. And whatever criteria we use, we should not have articles that have virtually no content and absolutely no references. No such user (talk) 08:40, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - There are plenty of sources found on simple GBS.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:35, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * So kindly demonstrate just one and I'll withdraw the nom -- "Žukovska" is a common Russian surname, "Žukovska reka" (the cannonical name) only yields geodatabase sites. No such user (talk) 20:47, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * --Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:57, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete article and put its content on Trgoviški Timok Žukovska seems to be a steam instead of a river like the article describes it. The article will always be a stub with one or two sentences, information available online is very limited and this makes notability of Žukovska to be far away from that of an article accepted by WP:Notability. Ktrimi991 (talk) 22:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * --Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:57, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete article and put its content on Trgoviški Timok Žukovska seems to be a steam instead of a river like the article describes it. The article will always be a stub with one or two sentences, information available online is very limited and this makes notability of Žukovska to be far away from that of an article accepted by WP:Notability. Ktrimi991 (talk) 22:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete article and put its content on Trgoviški Timok Žukovska seems to be a steam instead of a river like the article describes it. The article will always be a stub with one or two sentences, information available online is very limited and this makes notability of Žukovska to be far away from that of an article accepted by WP:Notability. Ktrimi991 (talk) 22:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  02:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: For discussion of the sources and with the reminder that two articles are nominated for deletion here.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  09:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.