Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/السيد فاضل جمال الدين


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:35, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

السيد فاضل جمال الدين

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Biographical article in Arabic which has been listed at Pages needing translation into English for 20 days. A Google translation doesn't help clarify whether the subject is notable. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:16, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I opposed the original PROD as the reasoning was not sound. I thought the second PROD was acceptable as an WP:IAR exception to the general about only being able to PROD an article once. In any event, the article should be deleted as the author has had ample time to translate but has given no indication of an intent to do so. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 07:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per Athomeinkobe. - HyperGaruda (talk) 08:01, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 30.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 08:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete not english at all. KGirlTrucker87talk what I'm been doing 11:38, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not suitable for English Wikipedia. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC).
 * SNOW Delete as clearly nothing comprehensibly better and I would've pursued the PROD instead. SwisterTwister   talk  07:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.